PERVIS
v.
STATE FARM FIRE & CASUALTY CO.

U.S. | 1990-10-09
No. 90-320
498 U.S. 899 Supreme Court of the United States (1990) Positive Treatment
Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Goldman v. State Farm Fire Gen. Ins. Co., 660 So. 2d 300 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995)
    …examination under oath is a material breach of the policy terms and a condition precedent to an insured’s right to recover and/or bring suit under the policy. See, e.g., Pervis v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co., 901 F. 2d 944 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 899, 111 S.Ct. 255, 112 L.Ed.2d 213 (1990) (policy provision requiring the insured to take an examination under oath was a condition precedent to suit and that noncomplianee constituted a material breach justifying the entry of summary judgment); Finebe…
  • …Courts in other jurisdictions also interpret EUO provisions to be conditions precedent to making a claim and filing suit to recover the claim under the policy. See Pervis v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co., 901 F. 2d 944, 947 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 899, 111 S.Ct. 255, 112 L.Ed.2d 213 (1990). It is well recognized that failure to comply with this condition precedent is a material breach of the insurance contract that precludes recovery. Goldman; Stringer v. Fireman’s Fund Ins. Co., 622 So. 2d 145…
  • Stringer v. Fireman's Fund Ins. Co., 622 So. 2d 145 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993)
    …each of the policy which will relieve the insurer of its liability to pay.” 13A Couch on Insurance 2d (Rev. ed.) § 49A:361, at 760 (1982) (footnote omitted). See also Pervis v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co., 901 F. 2d 944 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 899, 111 S.Ct. 255, 112 L.Ed.2d 213 (1990). Affirmed.…

Previewing 3 of 7 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw