CONWAY

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Munir A. Madiwale v. Savaiko, 117 F.3d 1321 (11th Cir. 1997)
  …(1996). Indeed, even intentional or reckless omissions will invalidate a warrant only if inclusion of the omitted facts would have prevented a finding of probable cause. United States v. Jenkins, 901 F. 2d 1075, 1080 (11th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 901, 111 S.Ct. 259, 112 L.Ed.2d 216 (1990). For example, in United States v. Haimowitz, 706 F. 2d 1549, 1557 (11th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1069, 104 S.Ct. 974, 79 L.Ed.2d 212 (1984), this court held that, where unsavory information relating t…
• United States v. Saeed Sirang, 70 F.3d 588 (11th Cir. 1995)
  …tates v. Wall, 37 F. 3d 1443, 1446 (10th Cir.1994). In check-kiting cases, separate checks have been considered separate executions of the scheme. See Poliak, 823 F. 2d at 372; United States v. Schwartz, 899 F. 2d 243, 248 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 901, 111 S.Ct. 259, 112 L.Ed.2d 217 (1990); see also United States v. Barnhart, 979 F. 2d 647, 650-51 (8th Cir.1992) (distinguishing checks in check-kiting cases from component acts in “a scheme to obtain a certain amount of funds or to obtain financing…
• United States v. Goldberg, 60 F.3d 1536 (11th Cir. 1995)
  …hout foundation in this circuit. For sentencing purposes, the face value of the bonds provides a reasonable quantification of the risk to unsuspecting buyers or lenders. See United States v. Jenkins, 901 F. 2d 1075, 1084 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 901, 111 S.Ct. 259, 112 L.Ed.2d 216 (1990). Jenkins pertained to the sentencing of a bank security guard for bank larceny involving stolen stock certificates. Jenkins claimed the sentencing court erred in calculating his sentence based on the face val…