IN RE STERN

Citator

Cited By

• Clark v. Roemer, 500 U.S. 646 (U.S. 1991)
  …her reasons for the District Court’s decision lack merit as well. The District Court maintained that the applicability of § 5 to judges was uncertain until our summary affirmance in Brooks v. Georgia State Bd. of Elections, 775 F. Supp. 1470, aff’d, 498 U. S. 916 (1990). But in Haith v. Martin, 618 F. Supp. 410 (EDNC 1985), aff’d, 477 U. S. 901 (1986), we issued a summary affirmance of a decision holding that §5 applied to judges. Nor did the District Court’s vague concerns about voter confusion and low vote…
• Brooks v. Ga. State Bd. OF Elections, 59 F.3d 1114 (11th Cir. 1995)
  …tial for discriminating against minority voters, and that the State of Georgia failed to obtain the required preclearance for numerous changes to their electoral system. Brooks v. State Bd. of Elections, 775 F.Supp. 1470, 1484 (S.D.Ga.1989), aff'd, 498 U.S. 916, 111 S.Ct. 288, 112 L.Ed.2d 243 (1990). Consequently, the Panel enjoined further elections or appointments to judicial positions that had not been preeleared, but allowed incumbents to serve out their terms. Id. at 1484. On June 17, 1992, Plainti…

  ← 1 / 3 →
• Brooks v. Ga. State Bd. OF Elections & Max Cleland, 997 F.2d 857 (11th Cir. 1993)
  …ctions were not covered by Section 5, and Brooks contending that the district court panel should have granted additional affirmative relief. The Supreme Court summarily affirmed the judgment in all respects. Brooks v. Georgia State Bd. of Elections, 498 U.S. 916, 111 S.Ct. 288, 112 L.Ed.2d 243 (1990) (mem.). On January 2, 1990, in compliance with the district court panel’s order, the State of Georgia requested reconsideration by the United States Attorney General of his June 16, 1989 objection to the forty…