WORTHEN

v.

OKLAHOMA

Citator

Cited By (11 total)

• United States v. Pielago, 135 F.3d 703 (11th Cir. 1998)
  …one in which a defense lawyer “intentionally decline[d] to object to a potentially unconstitutional trial procedure in order to inject reversible error into the proceeding.” United States v. Joshi 896 F. 2d 1303, 1307 n. 3 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 986, 111 S.Ct. 523, 112 L.Ed.2d 534 (1990). In my view, the record unequivocally indicates that Hechavarria’s testimony was obtained in violation of Varona’s proffer agreement. The record also indicates that the government had no legitimate and wholl…
• Vines v. United States, 28 F.3d 1123 (11th Cir. 1994)
  …as the right to representation by counsel. United States v. Joshi, 896 F. 2d 1303, 1307 (11th Cir.) (quoting Poole v. United States, 832 F. 2d 561, 564 (11th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 817, 109 S.Ct. 54, 102 L.Ed.2d 33 (1988)), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 986, 111 S.Ct. 523, 112 L.Ed.2d 534 (1990). Affirming habeas relief for the temporary absence of defendant’s counsel during trial, the Sixth Circuit faulted the trial judge for depriving the defendant of his right to counsel by arranging the counsel’s…
• Wise v. Williams, 982 F.2d 142 (4th Cir. 1992)
  …) (“[C]onsistent or regular application of a state’s procedural default rules does not mean undeviating adherence to such rule admitting of no exception.” (citing Dugger v. Adams, 489 U.S. 401, 109 S.Ct. 1211, 103 L.Ed.2d 435 (1989))), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 986, 111 S.Ct. 523, 112 L.Ed.2d 534 (1990). Indeed, the conscientious consideration of motions for extension and the granting of such motions may well be evidence that the [*144] rule is very strictly enforced; that is, that the rule’s requirement is…