WRENN
v.
OHIO ET AL.; KOUNO V. OREGON STATE BOARD OF HIGHER EDUCATION ET AL.; MCCAIN, A MINOR, BY HER NEXT FRIEND, MCCAIN, ET AL. V. HOUSTON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT ET AL.; JONES V. TURNER BROADCASTING SYSTEM, INC.; BROWN (LAMAR) V. FOX VALLEY & VICINITY CONSTRUCTION WORKERS PENSION FUND ET AL.; PHILLIPS V. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, FOREST SERVICE; BANKS V. GARRETT, SECRETARY OF THE NAVY; VOGEL V. ELLIS (THREE CASES); SANDS V. KENTUCKY; DEBOUE V. LOUISIANA; WILLIS V. FIRST BANK NATIONAL ASSN.; EYLER V. ILLINOIS; ABU-JAMAL V. PENNSYLVANIA; GOAD V. MORRIS, WARDEN; EVANS V. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE ET AL.; DAVIS V. KEMP, WARDEN; PRYOR V. ALLEN; HARRIS V. BURDORFF; LEPPALUOTO ET UX. V. UNITED STATES; WYATT V. SULLIVAN, SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES; WILLIS V. FIRST BANK NATIONAL ASSN.; PITTS V. GEORGIA; HALL V. GEORGIA; FROST V. CALIFORNIA; ANDERSON V. BORG, WARDEN, ET AL.; MCMILLIN V. MISSOURI; STAMEY V. GEORGIA; SAFIR V. PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA ET AL.; WRENN V. BOARD OF DIRECTORS, WHITNEY M. YOUNG, JR., HEALTH CENTER, INC., ET AL.; SMITH V. UNITED STATES; POLYAK V. HAMILTON, JUDGE, CHANCERY COURT OF LAWRENCE COUNTY, TENNESSEE; HELM, DBA BILLS GREEN LIGHT AUTO PARTS V. MID-AMERICA INDUSTRIES, INC.; MACHEN V. UNITED STATES; DOUTHWAITE V. VIRGINIA; INTERNATIONAL CONSULTING SERVICES, INC. V. GILBERT; STACK V. UNITED STATES; POLYAK V. HULEN ET AL.; AND POLYAK V. BOSTON ET AL.; SMITH V. UNITED STATES AIR FORCE; MOORE V. TRUMP CASINO-HOTEL; BYRUM ET AL. V. GRIMES ET AL., MADDEN V. THORBURN ET AL.; FIELDS V. ILLINOIS; WINSTON V. KOSSOFF; SHERRILLS V. MCMACKIN, WARDEN; STREET V. FOLTZ, WARDEN; MAY V. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION; LIDMAN V. NEWARK REDEVELOPMENT AND HOUSING AUTHORITY ET AL.; FRANKLIN V. ILLINOIS; BRAWLEY V. COLLINS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE; ALLUSTIARTE ET AL. V. COOPER; GREEN V. SOUTH CAROLINA; SCHMITZ V. GIBBS; BEVERLY ET UX. V. UNITED STATES; WAFER V. COLLINS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE; PETRARCA V. PICERNE ET AL.; QADHAFI V. VIRGINIA; HIGHTOWER V. GEORGIA; WEEKS V. ALABAMA; TURNER V. FALK, DIRECTOR, HAWAII DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ET AL.; LE WARD V. HUNT ET AL.; LEE V. ARMONTROUT, WARDEN, ET AL.; COTTON V. NEW MEXICO; TADROS V. COLEMAN ET AL.; MCGANN V. BIDERMAN ET AL.; HAWKINS V. ILLINOIS; LEPPALUOTO ET UX. V. NAZARIAN, DBA THE LAW CLINIC, GETROST V. UNITED STATES, RODRIGUEZ-DOSHI V. GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION ET AL.; BEAS V. CALIFORNIA; MADDEN V. NBD MORTGAGE CO. ET AL.; MOHIUDDIN V. ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS ET AL.
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
This is a Supreme Court order denying petitions for rehearing in approximately 60 cases that had been previously decided during the 1989-1990 term, covering diverse legal matters including criminal justice, administrative law, and civil rights. The Court's brief order indicates that all petitions for rehearing were denied and that Justice Souter did not participate in the decision.
© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
ante, p. 810; ante, p. 811; ante, p. 813; ante, p. 815; ante, p. 820; ante, p. 820; ante, p. 821; ante, p. 824; ante, p. 824; ante, p. 881; ante, p. 827; ante, p. 881; ante, p. 881; ante, p. 829; No. 89-7526. No. 89-7570. No. 89-7574. No. 89-7578. No. 89-7603. No. 89-7614. No. 89-7615. No. 89-7616. No. 89-7638. No. 89-7695. No. 89-7744. No. 89-7793. No. 89-7843. No. 90-2. No. 90-8. No. 90-58. No. 90-86. No. 90-116. No. 90-156. No. 90-177. No. 90-188. No. 90-265. No. 90-313. No. 90-362. No. 90-5002. No. 90-5037. No. 90-5052. No. 90-5066. No. 90-5068. ante, p. 830; ante, p. 881; ante, p. 831; ante, p. 831; ante, p. 832; ante, p. 833; ante, p. 833; ante, p. 881; ante, p. 881; ante, p. 835; ante, p. 838; ante, p. 881; ante, p. 843; ante, p. 845; ante, p. 845; ante, p. 848; ante, p. 849; ante, p. 850; ante, p. 852; ante, p. 853; ante, p. 854; ante, p. 856; ante, p. 899; ante, p. 900; ante, p. 856; ante, p. 858; ante, p. 859; ante, p. 881; ante, p. 860; No. 90-5070. No. 90-5076. No. 90-5095. No. 90-5098. No. 90-5109. No. 90-5125. No. 90-5131. No. 90-5148. No. 90-5151. No. 90-5155. No. 90-5159. No. 90-5200. No. 90-5214. No. 90-5217. No. 90-5236. No. 90-5240. No. 90-5244. No. 90-5245. No. 90-5264. No. 90-5267. No. 90-5307. No. 90-5328. No. 90-5341. No. 90-5348. No. 90-5362. No. 90-5388. No. 90-5441. No. 90-5449. ante, p. 860; ante, p. 860; ante, p. 861; ante, p. 861; ante, p. 881; ante, p. 862; ante, p. 863; ante, p. 881; ante, p. 864; ante, p. 864; ante, p. 864; ante, p. 866; ante, p. 866; ante, p. 882; ante, p. 882; ante, p. 867; ante, p. 868; ante, p. 868; ante, p. 869; ante, p. 869; ante, p. 871; ante, p. 881; ante, p. 872; ante, p. 873; ante, p. 901; ante, p. 874; ante, p. 902; and ante, p. 902. Petitions for rehear ing denied. Justice Souter took no part in the consideration or decision of these petitions.