IN RE MOODY

Citator

Cited By

• Melkonyan v. Sullivan, 501 U.S. 89 (U.S. 1991)
  …nt” under EAJA, thereby commencing the 30-day period for filing the fee application. Id., at 558-559. Because petitioner waited more than a year after the Appeals Council’s decision, his application was untimely. Id., at 559. We granted certio-rari, 498 U. S. 1023 (1991), and now vacate the judgment of the Court of Appeals. II As relevant to this case, EAJA provides: “(A) Except as otherwise specifically provided by statute, a court shall award to a prevailing party other than the United States fees and ot…
• Astoria Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass'n v. Solimino, 501 U.S. 104 (U.S. 1991)
  …litigation of the claim. The Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit reversed, 901 F. 2d 1148 (1990), inferring from the Act’s structure a legislative intent to deny preclusive effect to such state administrative proceedings. We granted certiorari, 498 U. S. 1023 (1991), to resolve the conflict between the ruling here under review, see also Duggan v. Board of Education of East Chicago Heights, Dist. No. 169, Cook County, Ill., 818 F. 2d 1291 (CA7 1987), and those of the Eighth Circuit in Stillians, supra, an…
• Nipper v. Smith, 39 F.3d 1494 (11th Cir. 1994)
  …the appellants failed to establish a case of vote dilution, we must address a question the Supreme Court has not decided and our divided en banc court in Solomon v. Liberty County, 899 F. 2d 1012 (11th Cir.1990) (en banc) (per curiam), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1023, 111 S.Ct. 670, 112 L.Ed.2d 663 (1991), has precluded us from answering: whether section 2 plaintiffs, in order to establish that the challenged electoral scheme is diluting their right to vote “on account of [their] race or color,” must demonstrate…

  ← 1 / 4 →