SARDINA

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Norbert Schlei, 122 F.3d 944 (11th Cir. 1997)
  …stantial rights; where an error had no substantial influence on the outcome, and sufficient evidence uninfected by error supports the verdict, reversal is not warranted.” United States v. Hawkins, 905 F. 2d 1489, 1493 (11th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1038, 111 S.Ct. 707, 112 L.Ed.2d 696 (1991). These documents were admitted to prove that Schlei had knowledge that the bond certificates were counterfeit. The Government introduced sufficient evidence unaffected by error that demonstrated that Schlei k…
• United States v. Ross, 33 F.3d 1507 (11th Cir. 1994)
  …ellant’s trial, we need not rule whether the admission of these bank records constituted an abuse of discretion, because, at worst, their admission was harmless error. See United States v. Hawkins, 905 F. 2d 1489, 1493 (11th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1038, 111 S.Ct. 707, 112 L.Ed.2d 696 (1991). . We note, initially, that the court did allow some redirect examination. . Two Spanish police officers testified that in late January 1988, they observed Appellant, Tre-panier, Blackledge, Sabio, LeBoeuf, an…
• United States v. Cary V. COX, 995 F.2d 1041 (11th Cir. 1993)
  …e VISA card should not be interpreted as evidence of intent to defraud. He knew the card was in his name and surely knew that the County was making payments on it.” Cf. United States v. Hawkins, 905 F. 2d 1489, 1496 (11th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1038, 111 S.Ct. 707, 112 L.Ed.2d 696 (1991) (“The Government need not produce direct proof of scienter in a [mail] fraud case, however; circumstantial evidence of criminal intent can suffice”). For forty-eight months, Cox floated the balance on his pers…