ROBERT THOMAS

v.

STATE

Citator

Cited By

• State v. Cordia, 564 So. 2d 601 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990)
  …ining. Under this section, and historically, a witness to a crime may render an opinion about the identification of the indi [*602] vidual involved, including identification by voice. Weinshenker v. State, 223 So. 2d 561 (Fla. 3d DCA), cert. denied, 225 So. 2d 918, cert. denied, 396 U.S. 973, 90 S.Ct. 462, 24 L.Ed.2d 441 (1969). Cordia does not quarrel with this general principle, but contends that since the two officer/witnesses were not the individuals who actually received the original telephone call, the…
• Coley v. State, 616 So. 2d 1017 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993)
  …otes and citations omitted; emphasis added).1 See also Lynch v. [*1019] State, 293 So. 2d 44, 45 (Fla.1974); Stewart v. State, 158 Fla. 753, 757-58, 30 So. 2d 489, 490-91 (1947); Weinshenker v. State, 223 So. 2d 561, 563 (Fla. 3d DCA), cert. denied, 225 So. 2d 918 (Fla.), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 973, 90 S.Ct. 462, 24 L.Ed.2d 441 (1969). If the evidence is insufficient under the foregoing standard, then the convictions must be reversed. B. For purposes of determining the sufficiency of the evidence, our revi…
• Everhart v. State, 592 So. 2d 352 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992)
  …facie case, must establish beyond a reasonable doubt the identity of the accused as perpetrator of the charged offense. Ponsell v. State, 393 So. 2d 635, 636 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981); Weinshenker v. State, 223 So. 2d 561, 563 (Fla. 3d DCA), cert. denied, 225 So. 2d 918 (Fla.), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 973, 90 S.Ct. 462, 24 L.Ed.2d 441 (1969); see Huggins v. State, 453 So. 2d 835 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984), review denied, 456 So. 2d 1182 (Fla.1984). Uncorroborated hearsay statements cannot be used as the sole evidence to co…

Authorities Cited

• Thomas v. State, 216 So. 2d 780 (Fla. 3d DCA 1968)