PRICE

v.

HARDY; SCHLICHER V. MUNOZ ET AL.; HARPER V. BUMPERS ET AL.; JOHNSON V. MACK; MARTIN V. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, EMPLOYMENT STANDARDS ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION

Citator

Cited By

• Chisom v. Roemer, 501 U.S. 380 (U.S. 1991)
• Toibb v. Radloff, 501 U.S. 157 (U.S. 1991)
  …ling that an individual nonbusiness debtor may not reorganize under Chapter 11 clearly conflicted with the holding of the Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit in In re Moog, 774 F. 2d 1073 (1985), we granted certiorari to resolve the conflict.4 498 U. S. 1060 (1991). II A In our view, the plain language of the Bankruptcy Code disposes of the question before us. Section 109, 11 U. S. C. § 109, defines who may be a debtor under the various chapters of the Code. Section 109(d) provides: “Only a person…
• Houston Lawyers' Ass'n v. Attorney General of Texas, 501 U.S. 419 (U.S. 1991)
  …he Act is concerned only with the intent of persons of ‘race or color’ in casting a ballot; it has no interest in the function of the person holding the office.” Id., at 652 (emphasis in original). I — i I — i We granted certiorari in these cases, 498 U. S. 1060 (1991), and in Chisom v. Roemer, ante, p. 380, for the limited purpose of considering the scope of the coverage of § 2. As we have held in Chisom, the Act does not categorically exclude judicial elections from its coverage. The term “representatives…