WOODDELL

v.

INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS, LOCAL 71, ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Griffin v. United States, 502 U.S. 46 (U.S. 1991)
  …d convicted her of conspiring to defraud the IRS, for which there was sufficient proof, or of conspiring to defraud the DEA, for which (as the Government concedes) there was not. United States v. Beverly, 913 F. 2d 337 (1990). We granted certiorari, 498 U. S. 1082 (1991). The question presented for review, as set forth in the petition, is simply whether a general verdict of guilty under circumstances such as existed here “is reversible.” The body of the petition, however, sets forth the Due Process Clause of…
• Wooddell v. Int'l Bhd. OF Elec. Workers, 502 U.S. 93 (U.S. 1991)
  …-of-contract claim, the Court of Appeals relied on prior Circuit precedent2 in holding that §301 did not authorize such an action to be brought by an individual union member. We granted certiorari to address both the jury trial and the § 301 issues. 498 U. S. 1082 (1991). [*97] II We first address the jury trial issue. The case below was briefed and argued before our decision in Teamsters v. Terry, 494 U. S. 558 (1990). Although Terry was handed down on March 20, 1990, well before the decision of the Court o…
• Terence D. Hughey v. JMS Dev. Corp., 78 F.3d 1523 (11th Cir. 1996)
  …prior orders granting injunctive-type relief, i.e., that the permanent injunction merely continued in place what previous orders had already done. See, e.g., Keyes v. School Dist. No. 1., Denver, Colo., 895 F. 2d 659 (10th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1082, 111 S.Ct. 951, 112 L.Ed.2d 1040 (1991). We doubt that such an exception exists, unless in very rare, exceptional cases. A person enjoined by court order should only be required to look within the four comers of the injunction to determine what he…