KRAIN

v.

GEORGE ET AL.; AND KRAIN V. UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN HOSPITAL ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (11 total)

• United States v. Rutherford, 175 F.3d 899 (11th Cir. 1999)
  …ver published any cases addressing a situation like the one presented in the instant case, we have required strict compliance with 21 U.S.C. section 851(a)(1). See United States v. Weaver, 905 F. 2d 1466, 1481 (11th Cir.1990), cert. denied sub nom. 498 U.S. 1091, 111 S.Ct. 972, 112 L.Ed.2d 1058 (1991). We have ruled, for example, that the government’s failure to file a timely section 851(a)(1) notice precludes enhancement even if the defendant knew before trial that he was subject to a sentence enhancement…
• United States v. Sanchez, 138 F.3d 1410 (11th Cir. 1998)
  …. The language of the statute is mandatory, requiring strict compliance with the procedural requirements of sections 851(a) and (b). See United States v. Weaver, 905 F. 2d 1466, 1481 (11th Cir.1990), cert. denied sub nom. Sikes v. United States, 498 U.S. 1091, 111 S.Ct. 972, 112 L.Ed.2d 1058 (1991). Rather than filing an information with the court, the government’s amended notice of enhancement consisted of a summary listing of seven convictions — not all of which were prior felony drug offenses as the…
• United States v. Stanley, 24 F.3d 1314 (11th Cir. 1994)
  …dicated that appellant and [her companion] had made several brief trips from Atlanta to Miami and back to Atlanta during the preceding seven months, a reasonable jury could readily find appellant guilty as charged in the indictment.”), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1091, 111 S.Ct. 972, 112 L.Ed.2d 1058 (1991). . United States v. Jones, 913 F. 2d 1552, 1560 (11th Cir.1990) (witness testified that the defendant sought, assistance in removing the inside panel of the car door to hid the cocaine). . The government fai…