BOUT

v.

STATE BAR OF MICHIGAN ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Harden, 37 F.3d 595 (11th Cir. 1994)
  …rell, 963 F. 2d 976, 992-93 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 113 S.Ct. 357, 121 L.Ed.2d 270 (1992); United States v. Adams, 914 F. 2d 1404, 1406-07 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1015, 111 S.Ct. 588, 112 L.Ed.2d 593 (1990), and cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1100, 111 S.Ct. 996, 112 L.Ed.2d 1080 (1991); United States v. Espinosa, 827 F. 2d 604, 616-17 (9th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 968, 108 S.Ct. 1243, 99 L.Ed.2d 441 (1988). In Espinosa, the defendant was convicted for possession of cocaine with in…
• Pope v. Hightower, 101 F.3d 1382 (11th Cir. 1996)
  …328, 331 (9th Cir.1990) (holding de novo review was required because "the application of law to fact will require the consideration of legal concepts and involve the exercise of judgment about the values underlying legal principles”), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1100, 111 S.Ct. 996, 112 L.Ed.2d 1079 (1991); Iron Eyes v. Henry, 907 F. 2d 810, 813 (8th Cir.1990). . We note that the district court proceeded to compound its error by dictating the precise course the prison officials had to follow to rectify the perc…