PIERCE

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Bestfoods, 524 U.S. 51 (U.S. 1998)
  …113 F. 3d 572, 580 (CA6 1997) (case below) (parent may be held liable for controlling affairs of subsidiary only when the corporate veil can be pierced), and Joslyn Mfg. Co. v. T. L. James & Co., 893 F. 2d 80, 82-83 (CA5 1990) (same), cert. denied, 498 U. S. 1108 (1991) (but cf. Riverside Market Dev. Corp. v. International Bldg. Prods., Inc., 931 F. 2d 327, 330 (CA5) (parent companies that actually participate in the wrongful conduct cannot hide behind the corporate veil, and can be held directly liable with…
• Redwing Carriers, Inc. v. Saraland Apts., 94 F.3d 1489 (11th Cir. 1996)
  …the corporation’s acts); Joslyn Mfg. Co. v. T.L. James & Co., 893 F. 2d 80, 83 (5th Cir.1990) (noting a similar lack of any intent to extend CERCLA liability directly to a parent corporation based on the liability of its subsidiary), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1108, 111 S.Ct. 1017, 112 L.Ed.2d 1098 (1991). That the Hutton partners are not owners of the Site under CERCLA does not end our analysis. This only means the limited partners are not directly liable under the Act for cleaning up the Site. The questio…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• In re Sassower, 510 U.S. 4 (U.S. 1993)
  …or decision of the motion in No. 93-5252. * See Sassower v. New York, 499 U. S. 966 (1991) (certiorari); In re Sassower, 499 U. S. 935 (1991) (mandamus/prohibition); In re Sassower, 499 U. S. 935 (1991) (mandamus/prohibition); Sassower v. Mahoney, 498 U. S. 1108 (1991); In re Sassower, 499 U. S. 904 (1991) (mandamus/prohibition); In re Sassower, 498 U. S. 1081 (1991) (habeas corpus); In re Sassower, 498 U. S. 1081 (1991) (mandamus/prohibition); Sassower v. United States Court of Appeals for D. C. Cir., 498…