DALY

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Dennis v. State, 685 So. 2d 1373 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996)
  …the financial considerations — filing fees and attorney’s fees — that deter other litigants from filing frivolous petitions.” Holmes, 669 So. 2d at 361, citing In re Sin-dram, 498 U.S. 177, 179-180, 111 S.Ct. 596, 597, 112 L.Ed.2d 599, reh’g denied, 498 U.S. 1116, 111 S.Ct. 1029, 112 L.Ed.2d 1110 (1991). The Florida Supreme Court and the First and Fourth District Courts have also entered similar orders in cases where it was apparent that the petitioner had interfered with the orderly process of judicial ad…
• Holmes v. State, 669 So. 2d 360 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996)
  …, barred the defendant leave to proceed in forma pauperis in any further extraordinary relief proceedings. In so ruling, the Anderson Court cited to the reasoning set forth in In re Sindram, 498 U.S. 177, 111 S.Ct. 596, 112 L.Ed.2d 599, reh’g denied 498 U.S. 1116, 111 S.Ct. 1029, 112 L.Ed.2d 1110 (1991): [*361] The goal of fairly dispensing justice ... is compromised when the Court is forced to devote its limited resources to the processing of repetitious and frivolous requests. Pro se petitioners have a gre…
• Martin v. Honorable Paul Marko, 651 So. 2d 819 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995)
  …Court had already denied abusive petitioners’ indigent status in future filings under authority of the Court’s pre-amendment general in forvia pauperis rule, Rule 39. In re Sindram, 498 U.S. 177, 111 S.Ct. 596, 112 [*821] L.Ed.2d 599, reh’g denied, 498 U.S. 1116, 111 S.Ct. 1029, 112 L.Ed.2d 1110 (1991); In re McDonald, 489 U.S. 180, 109 S.Ct. 993, 103 L.Ed.2d 158 (1989). The Court explained in Sindram, 498 U.S. at 180, 111 S.Ct. at 597-98: In order to prevent frivolous petitions for extraordinary relief fr…