CASTANEDA

v.

HENMAN, WARDEN

Citator

Cited By

• Eliezer Moshe Malek and Malke Malek v. Fed. Ins. Co., 994 F.2d 49 (2d Cir. 1993)
  …under the business records exception to the hearsay rule. See United States v. Ray, 930 F. 2d 1368, 1370 (9th Cir.1990) (testimony of a welfare fraud investigator about the contents of a welfare file was admissible under Rule 803(6)), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1124, 111 S.Ct. 1084, 112 L.Ed.2d 1189 (1991); see also United States v. King, 613 F. 2d 670 (7th Cir.1980) (social security investigative reports held admissible under Rule 803(6)). We also conclude that the district court should have admitted Barber’s…
• Brookins v. Kolb, 990 F.2d 308 (7th Cir. 1993)
  …n. See Kentucky Dep’t of Corrections v. Thompson, 490 U.S. 454, 460, 462-63, 109 S.Ct. 1904, 1908, 1909-10, 104 L.Ed.2d 506 (1989); Wolff, 418 U.S. at 556-58, 94 S.Ct. at 2974-76; Castaneda v. Henman, 914 F. 2d 981, 983 (7th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1124, 111 S.Ct. 1085, 112 L.Ed.2d 1190 (1991); Caldwell, 790 F. 2d at 603. III. Conclusion The district court properly viewed this lawsuit as involving associational rights, rather than free speech and petition rights. The district court also properly…
• Ramirez v. Turner, 991 F.2d 351 (7th Cir. 1993)
  …does not possess a constitutionally protected liberty interest, in remaining at a particular institution. This is true even if the transfer is labeled disciplinary or punitive. Castaneda v. Henman, 914 F. 2d 981, 983-84 (7th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1124, 111 S.Ct. 1085, 112 L.Ed.2d 1190 (1991). He advances two theories, however, why the general doctrine does not apply to his transfer to Marion. Ramirez’ first claim is that, “Because of Marion’s uniquely harsh conditions of confinement, transfer fr…