IN RE ADOPTION OF KATHERINE MICHELLE SAMPLES, BY MANUEL G. MANOUSOS. WILLIAM MELVIN SAMPLES, APPELLANT,
v.
MANUEL G. MANOUSOS, APPELLEE

Fla. 2d DCA | 1969-09-03
No. 69-115
LILES, A. C. J., and PIERCE and MANN, JJ., concur.
226 So. 2d 135 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1969)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

In an adoption proceeding where the biological mother's former husband sought to adopt her child born during her marriage to another man, the trial court ordered blood tests to determine paternity. The biological father appealed the order, and the appellate court affirmed, holding that trial courts have wide discretion to order blood tests when determining paternity and the child's best interests.


Holding

The trial court has jurisdiction and wide discretion to order blood tests when determining paternity and the best interests of the child in adoption proceedings. The appellate court will not disturb such orders when the trial judge exercises this discretion reasonably.


Key Quotes

“We believe the court has wide discretion in determining these matters and particularly in determining the best interests of the child.”

Establishes the broad discretionary authority of trial courts in adoption and paternity matters

Previewing 1 of 2 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

Manuel Manousos, the former husband of Coralee Samples, filed a petition to adopt Katherine Michelle Samples, a minor child born to Coralee Samples an…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

This is an interlocutory appeal from orders entered by the trial judge requiring Manuel G. Manousos, appellee here and petitioner below, William Melvin Samples, appellant here and respondent below, and Katherine Michelle Samples to submit to blood tests to determine the paternity of Katherine Michelle Samples, the adoptive child. The results of the blood tests are to be used as medical testimony in the adoption proceedings filed by petitioner Manuel G. Manousos.

Manuel Manousos, who was the former husband of Coralee Samples Manousos, filed a petition to adopt the minor child of Coralee Samples and William Samples. The petition set forth that Coralee Samples and William Samples were previously husband and wife and while they lived together as husband and wife the minor child, Katherine Michelle Samples, was born. Subsequent to her birth her mother, Cora-lee Samples, married the petitioner, Manuel G. Manousos. This marriage culminated in divorce. The petitioner alleges that even though the child was born while William Samples and Coralee Samples lived together as husband and wife he was in fact the natural father and that this was sufficient to rebut the presumption that William Samples was both the legal and natural father. The natural mother, Cora-lee Samples, filed her consent to the adoption and alleged therein that Manuel G. Manousos was the natural father of the child sought to be adopted. William Samples filed his answer and objections to said adoption. Petitioner Manousos then filed his motion requesting an order directing these parties to undergo a blood test. The trial judge granted this motion and respondent Samples brings this appeal.

The question then for this court to decide is whether or not the trial court had jurisdiction over the parties so as to require them to subject themselves to a blood test.

We believe the court has wide discretion in determining these matters and particularly in determining the best interests of the child. If in his discretion he believes a blood test to be of importance in determining the paternity and therefore the best interest of this child this court will not disturb the order appealed.

Affirmed.

LILES, A. C. J., and PIERCE and MANN, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw