VANDERLAAN

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Eurus Kelly Waters v. Thomas, 46 F.3d 1506 (11th Cir. 1995)
  …Boyde analysis is its adoption of the reasonable likelihood standard, as opposed to the standard used by our panel, i.e., whether a reasonable juror could have failed to understand the instruction and the proper role of mitigation.”), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 954, 111 S.Ct. 1432, 113 L.Ed.2d 483 (1991). The Boyde standard and analysis has been followed by subsequent Supreme Court cases, Johnson v. Texas, - U.S. -, -, 113 S.Ct. 2658, 2669, 125 L.Ed.2d 290 (1993), Estelle v. McGuire, 502 U.S. 62, 112 S.Ct. 4…
• High v. Head, 209 F.3d 1257 (11th Cir. 2000)
  …High v. Zant, 916 F. 2d 1507 (11th Cir.1990). This Court also denied High’s request for rehearing. The United States Supreme Court again denied High’s petition for a writ of certiorari and his subsequent petition for rehearing. See High v. Zant, 499 U.S. 954, 111 S.Ct. 1432, 113 L.Ed.2d 483, reh’g denied, 500 U.S. 938, 111 S.Ct. 2069, 114 L.Ed.2d 473 (1991). High subsequently filed a second state habeas petition in the Superior Court of Butts County. That court held an eviden-tiary hearing in Septembe…
• Etheria Verdell Jackson v. Crosby, 437 F.3d 1290 (11th Cir. 2006)
  …er we nor the district court need reach the constitutional analysis mandated by Slack. A district court’s denial of relief under Rule 60(b) is reviewable for abuse of discretion. See High v. Zant, 916 F. 2d 1507, 1509 (11th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 954, 111 S.Ct. 1432, 113 L.Ed.2d 483 (1991). A district court by definition abuses its discretion in relying on an erroneous interpretation of applicable law. See Mincey v. Head, 206 F. 3d 1106, 1137, n. 69 (11th Cir.2000); Alexander v. Fulton County,…