HEARST CORP.

v.

IOWA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE AND FINANCE

Citator

Cited By

• Mercer David Grayson v. K Mart Corp., 79 F.3d 1086 (11th Cir. 1996)
  …oin those courts in holding that the single filing rule applies to ADEA eases.”) (citing Anson v. University of Texas Health Science Ctr., 962 F. 2d 539, 541 (5th Cir.1992)); Tolliver v. Xerox Corp., 918 F. 2d 1052, 1058 (2d Cir.1990), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 983, 111 S.Ct. 1641, 113 L.Ed.2d 736 (1991). Issue 2: The Representative Class Action Charge K Mart argues that even if the piggybacking rule is applicable to ADEA cases, Judge Shoob erred in allowing putative plaintiffs to piggyback onto Grayson’s EEO…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Cummins v. United States, 502 U.S. 962 (U.S. 1991)
  …1512 (CA10 1988); United States v. Smith, 799 F. 2d 704 (CA11 1986). In recent months, this Court has denied review of at least two other cases raising pretextual search claims. See, e. g., Anderson v. Illinois, ante, p. 824; Hope v. United States, 499 U. S. 983 (1991). I would grant certiorari to address this recurring issue and to resolve the split in the Courts of Appeals.…