HARICH

v.

FLORIDA

Citator

Cited By

• Randolph v. State, 853 So. 2d 1051 (Fla. 2003)
  …earl’s status as a special deputy sheriff did not conflict with his duties as a defense attorney and that there was no per se conflict of interest between Pearl and the Defendant. See Harich v. State, 573 So. 2d 303, 305 (Fla.1990); U.S. cert. den., 499 U.S. 985, 111 S.Ct. 1645, 113 L.Ed.2d 740 (1991). The Court finds Pearl’s status as a special deputy sheriff did not conflict with his duty to represent the defendant in this case and there has been no showing that such status adversely affected Pearl’s per…
• Quince v. State, 732 So. 2d 1059 (Fla. 1999)
  …a.1989) (hereinafter Harich 1), concerning the alleged conflict of interest in trial counsel Howard Pearl’s concomitant service as a special deputy sheriff. See also Harich v. State, 573 So. 2d 303 (Fla.1990), petition for cert. filed[cert. denied], 499 U.S. 985, 111 S.Ct. 1645, 113 L.Ed.2d 740 (1991)(trial court’s finding of no conflict of interest following an evidentiary hearing affirmed on appeal). Quince filéd a subsequent 3.850 motion in circuit court claiming conflict of interest based on Pearl’s r…
• Teffeteller v. Dugger, 676 So. 2d 369 (Fla. 1996)
  …e nor the sheriff ever intended for him to act as a deputy and he did not do so. Consequently, we held that Pearl’s status as a special deputy did not result in a per se conflict of interest. Harich v. State, 573 So. 2d 303 (Fla.1990), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 985, 111 S.Ct. 1645, 113 L.Ed.2d 740 (1991). Because Pearl had defended many capital cases in Volusia County, several other convicted defendants who had been represented by him raised the same claim. Because these defendants were not parties to the Har…

Authorities Cited

• Gregg v. Georgia, 428 U.S. 153 (U.S. 1976)