COLE
v.
TEXAS
Justice Scalia,
Circuit Justice.
I have before me an application for a stay of execution pending disposition of a petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas. The petitioner seeks direct review of the judgment of the Texas courts affirming his death sentence.
I will in this case, and in every capital case on direct review, grant a stay of execution pending disposition by this Court of the petition for certiorari. While I will not extend the time for filing a petition beyond an established execution date, see Madden v. Texas, 498 U. S. 1301 (1991) (Scalia, J., in chambers), neither will I permit the State’s execution date to interfere with the orderly processing of a petition on direct review by this Court.
It is so ordered.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Rodriguez v. Texas, 515 U.S. 1307 (U.S. 1995)…lication states that he is scheduled to be executed on November 8, 1995. I have said that “I will... in every capital case on direct review, grant a stay of execution pending disposition by this Court of the petition for certiorari.” Cole v. Texas, 499 U. S. 1301 (1991). I have also made clear, however, that the purpose of such a stay is to prevent the execution date from “interfering] with the orderly processing of a petition on direct review by this Court.” Ibid. In the present case, and at the present tim…
Authorities Cited
- Madden v. Texas, 498 U.S. 1301 (U.S. 1991)