FENWICK
v.
SEARS'S ADMINISTRATORS
The Court gave the following judgment.
“ It is decreed by the court that the defendants Stricker “ and Payson, not having obtained letters of administration “ in the district of Columbia, were not competent to main " tain this action; and that the circuit court of the “ United States in and for the said district erred in over- “ ruling the demurrer. It is therefore considered by the “ court, that the judgment of the said circuit court, on “ the said demurrer, be, and the same is hereby reversed, “ and that judgment thereon be rendered for the defend- " ant in the original action.”*
*
The reporter was not in court when this judgment was entered, but he has understood that the court did not assign the reasons upon which their opinion was grounded; and gave no opinion upon the other points. See Evans on bills, 67, 68, 69, 70, & 71, as to notice.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
James Moody Vaughan and others v. Northup, 15 Pet. 1 (U.S. 1841)
-
Noonan v. Bradley, 9 Wall. 394 (U.S. 1869)
-
Kennedy v. The Bank of the State of Ga., 8 How. 586 (U.S. 1850)
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence