MARINE INSURANCE COMPANY OF ALEXANDRIA,
v.
JAMES YOUNG
MARINE INSURANCE COMPANY OF ALEXANDRIA,
JAMES YOUNG
1 Cranch 332
Supreme Court of the United States (1803)
Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 2 L. Ed. 126 · 1803 U.S. LEXIS 366 · SCDB 1803-017
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion of the Court
The Court reversed the judgment, and ordered it to be arrested, because the action is a special action upon the case on the policy, and the declaration shows that the policy is a specialty.
The court seemed to be of opinion that an action of covenant would lie upon it against the company in their corporate name.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Harding v. Harding, 198 U.S. 317 (U.S. 1905)
-
Burton N. Pugach v. Honorable Isidore Dollinger, 277 F.2d 739 (2d Cir. 1960)…erest set forth by Congress in the Federal Communications Act with such thoroughness as to preempt the states from regulation save for certain stated exceptions not here applicable. Benanti v. United States, 1957, 355 U.S. 96, 103-106, 78 S.Ct. 155, 2 L.Ed. 126. I receive the impression from reading the majority opinion that the majority, although having a deep and abiding respect for the supremacy clause, do not think that a federal court should ever interfere with the prosecution of a state criminal pro…