SANDERS
v.
CALIFORNIA; HAFDAHL V. TEXAS; WALLACE V. INDIANA

U.S. | 1991-05-28
Nos. 90-7259; No. 90-7518; No. 90-7592
500 U.S. 948 Supreme Court of the United States (1991) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Rutledge v. United States, 517 U.S. 292 (U.S. 1996)
    …ted States v. Anderson, 39 F. 3d 331, 357 (CADC 1994), rev’d on other grounds, 59 F. 3d 1323 (CADC 1995) (en banc). United States v. Aiello, 771 F. 2d 621, 634 (CA2 1985); United States v. Fernandez, 916 F. 2d 125, 128-129 (CA3 1990), cert. denied, 500 U. S. 948 (1991). See, e. g., Ball v. United States, 470 U. S. 856, 861-864 (1985) (concluding that multiple prosecutions were barred because statutes directed at “receipt” and “possession” of a firearm amounted to the “same offense,” in that proof of receip…
  • Brown v. Sanders, 546 U.S. 212 (U.S. 2006)
    …despite invalidation of one of several aggravating factors.” People v. Sanders, 51 Cal. 3d 471, 520, 797 P. 2d 561, 589-590 (1990) (in bank). It affirmed the conviction and sentence in all other respects. We denied certiorari. Sanders v. California, 500 U. S. 948 (1991). Sanders then filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U. S. C. §2254 in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, arguing, as relevant here, that the jury’s consideration of invalid special…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw