TATE, WARDEN

v.

BELL

Citator

Cited By

• Walker v. Nationsbank OF Fla. N.A., 53 F.3d 1548 (11th Cir. 1995)
  …ecks, Inc., 886 F. 2d 299, 302 (11th Cir.1989). In this circuit, it is well established that EEOC determinations are generally admissible in bench trials. Barfield v. Orange County, 911 F. 2d 644, 649 (11th Cir.1990) (listing cases), cert. denied, 500 U.S. 954, 111 S.Ct. 2263, 114 L.Ed.2d 715 (1991). We have not seen fit, however, to apply the same liberal admissibility rule to determination letters in jury trials. In particular, the distinction between a bench and a jury trial may affect the district c…
• Ensley Branch v. Seibels, 31 F.3d 1548 (11th Cir. 1994)
  …ourt does not consider discrimination against women to be as invidious ... as discrimination against blacks or other racial minorities; nor ... does it consider discrimination against men to be as invidious as racial discrimination.”), cert. denied, 500 U.S. 954, 111 S.Ct. 2261, 114 L.Ed.2d 714 (1991); see also Lamprecht v. Federal Communications Comm’n, 958 F. 2d 382, 391 (D.C.Cir.1992) (majority opinion of Thomas, Circuit Justice). A year after Cro-son, we recognized that intermediate scrutiny still app…
• Lathem v. Dep't OF Child. & Youth Servs., 172 F.3d 786 (11th Cir. 1999)
  …ead, the district court must make the admissibility determination on an individual basis, considering the evidence’s probative value and the danger of unfair prejudice. See Barfield v. Orange County, 911 F. 2d 644, 650 (11th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 500 U.S. 954, 111 S.Ct. 2263, 114 L.Ed.2d 715 (1991). In its request to have the reports admitted, DCYS argued that failure to admit the reports would prejudice it because in both reports Lathem alleged that Smith, rather than Smith and Reed, had engaged in si…