WILLY

v.

COASTAL CORP. ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Nordic Vill., Inc., 503 U.S. 30 (U.S. 1992)
  …rmed. 915 F. 2d 1049 (1990). It upheld the reasoning of the lower courts and rejected a jurisdictional defense (raised for the first time on appeal) that sovereign immunity barred the judgment entered against the Government. We granted certiorari. 501 U. S. 1216 (1991). II Section 106 of the Bankruptcy Code provides: “(a) A governmental unit is deemed to have waived sovereign immunity with respect to any claim against such governmental unit that is property of the estate and that arose out of the same tr…
• Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Tech. Servs., Inc., 504 U.S. 451 (U.S. 1992)
  …t power in the service and parts markets. It rejected Kodak’s contention that lack of market power in service and parts must be assumed when such power is absent in the equipment market. Because of the importance of the issue, we granted certiorari. 501 U. S. 1216 (1991). I A Because this case comes to us on petitioner Kodak’s motion for summary judgment, “[t]he evidence of [respondents] is to be believed, and all justifiable inferences are to be drawn in [their] favor.” Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 47…
• Willy v. Coastal Corp., 503 U.S. 131 (U.S. 1992)
  …. We granted certiorari to decide whether a federal district court may impose sanctions pursuant to Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure in a case in which the district court is later determined to be without subject-matter jurisdiction. 501 U. S. 1216 (1991). We conclude that in the circumstances presented here it may do so. Petitioner Willy sued respondent Coastal Corporation (Coastal or respondent) in Texas state court, raising a variety of claims relating to Coastal’s decision to terminate hi…