PEREZ

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Morgan v. Illinois, 504 U.S. 719 (U.S. 1992)
  …lina agree with Illinois that the “reverse-Witherspoon” inquiry is unnecessary so long as, by questions and oath, each juror swears to be fair and impartial and to follow the law. See Riley v. State, 585 A. 2d 719, 725-726 (Del. 1990), cert. denied, 501 U. S. 1223 (1991); State v. Hyman, 276 S. C. 559, 563, 281 S. E. 2d 209, 211-212 (1981), cert. denied, 458 U. S. 1122 (1982). Missouri appears to be of this view as well. State v. McMillin, 783 S. W. 2d 82, 94 (Mo.), cert. denied, 498 U. S. 881 (1990). Cal…
• United States v. Delgado, 56 F.3d 1357 (11th Cir. 1995)
  …Hernandez’s actions calculated to ensure success of the substantive crime, even though they took place after the thwarted delivery, support a conviction for aiding and abetting. United States v. Perez, 922 F. 2d 782, 786 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1223, 111 S.Ct. 2840, 115 L.Ed.2d 1009 (1991). A reasonable jury could have found that Hernandez associated himself with the conspiracy, and “that by conducting surveillance and actively seeking the lost cocaine, [he] intended to bring about the successf…
• United States v. Lyons, 53 F.3d 1198 (11th Cir. 1995)
  …e possession of cocaine with the intent to aid in the commission of the offense, as required to convict her of aiding and abetting the possession of cocaine with intent to distribute. United States v. Perez, 922 F. 2d 782 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1223, 111 S.Ct. 2840, 115 L.Ed.2d 1009 (1991) (aiding and abetting theory). Riding in Reese’s car on two occasions and twice accompanying Reese to the crack house were sufficient actions under the circumstances. Evidence of “mere presence” alone is not…