IN RE ROBINSON

Citator

Cited By

• Smith v. Barry, 502 U.S. 244 (U.S. 1992)
  …inadequate as a notice of appeal. Id., at 896, n. 7. Given its conclusion that a brief can never be considered a notice of appeal, however, the Fourth Circuit expressed no opinion on the significance of these omissions. Ibid. We granted certiorari, 501 U. S. 1249 (1991), to decide whether an appellate brief may serve as the notice of appeal required by Rule 3. This question has divided the Courts of Appeals. Compare Smith v. Galley, supra; United States v. Cooper, 876 F. 2d 1192, 1196 (CA5 1989) (appellate b…
• Robertson v. Seattle Audubon Soc'y, 503 U.S. 429 (U.S. 1992)
  …sh., Dec. 18,1990, and May 24,1991). While the District Court proceedings were ongoing, the agencies jointly sought review of the Ninth Circuit’s judgment that the first sentence of subsection (b)(6)(A) was unconstitutional. We granted certiorari, 501 U. S. 1249 (1991), and now reverse.3 II The first sentence of subsection (b)(6)(A) provided that “management of areas according to subsections (b)(3) and (b)(5)... is adequate consideration for the purpose of meeting the statutory requirements that are the b…