SMITH

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Amendment TO Fla. Rule OF Crim. Procedure 3.111(d)(2)-(3), 719 So. 2d 873 (Fla. 1998)
  …atrick v. Wainwright, 800 F. 2d 1057 (11th Cir.1986), for a list of factors the court may consider. See also McKaskle v. Wiggins, 465 U.S. 168, 104 S.Ct. 944, 79 L.Ed.2d 122 (1984), and Savage v. Estelle, 924 F. 2d 1459 (9th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1255, 111 S.Ct. 2900, 115 L.Ed.2d 1064 (1992), which suggest that the defendant’s right to self-representation is limited when the defendant is not able or willing to abide by the rules of procedure and courtroom protocol. APPENDIX B FARETTA INQUIRY TR…
• Bowen v. State, 677 So. 2d 863 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996)
  …permitting denials of the Faretta right to an accused who is unable to abide by rules of courtroom procedure, just as the right may be denied to those who are unwilling so to do.” Savage v. Estelle, 924 F. 2d 1459, 1466 (9th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1255, 111 S.Ct. 2900, 115 L.Ed.2d 1064 (1991).2 We do not perceive McKaskle to mean that the Supreme Court has expanded the elemental Faretta concept to include the notion of “able and willing to abide by rules of procedure and courtroom protocol” as add…
• Amendments to the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, 794 So. 2d 457 (Fla. 2000)
  …patrick v. Wainwright, 800 F. 2d 1057 (11th Cir.1986), for a list of factors the court may consider. See also McKaskle v. Wiggins, 465 U.S. 168, 104 S.Ct. 944, 79 L.Ed.2d 122 (1984), and Savage v. Estelle, 924 F. 2d 1459 (9th Cir.1990), cert. denied 501 U.S. 1255, 111 S.Ct. 2900, 115 L.Ed.2d 1064 (1991), which suggest that the defendant’s right to self-representation is limited when the defendant is not able or 'willing to abide by the rules of procedure and courtroom protocol. 2000 Amendment. This rule app…