WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE

v.

WILLIAM WRIGLEY, JR., CO.

Citator

Cited By

• Keeney v. Tamayo-Reyes, 504 U.S. 1 (U.S. 1992)
  …was properly explained to him. 926 F. 2d, at 1502.1 [*5] We granted certiorari to decide whether the deliberate bypass standard is the correct standard for excusing a habeas petitioner’s failure to develop a material fact in state-court proceedings. 502 U. S. 807 (1991). We reverse. Because the holding of Townsend v. Sain that Fay v. Noia’s deliberate bypass standard is applicable in a case like this had not been reversed, it is quite understandable that the Court of Appeals applied that standard in this c…
• Nordlinger v. Hahn, 505 U.S. 1 (U.S. 1992)
  …incidental” to an acquisition-value approach. Finally, the Court of Appeal found its conclusion was unchanged by the exemptions in Article XIIIA. Ibid. The Supreme Court of California denied review. App. to Pet. for Cert. Bl. We granted certiorari. 502 U. S. 807 (1991). [*10] II The Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, § 1, commands that no State shall “deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.” Of course, most laws differentiate in some fashion between cl…
• United States v. Wilson, 503 U.S. 329 (U.S. 1992)
  …in state custody. Reversing the District Court, the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit held that Wilson had a right to credit and that the District Court should have awarded it to him. 916 F. 2d 1115 (1990). We granted certiorari, 502 U. S. 807 (1991), and now reverse. II The Attorney General, through the Bureau of Prisons (BOP), has responsibility for imprisoning federal offenders. See 18 U. S. C. § 3621(a). From 1966 until 1987, a provision codified at 18 U. S. C. § 3568 (1982 ed.) req…