INDEPENDENT FRUIT & PRODUCE CO. ET AL.
v.
CENTRAL STATES, SOUTHEAST AND SOUTHWEST AREAS PENSION FUND ET AL.
INDEPENDENT FRUIT & PRODUCE CO. ET AL.
CENTRAL STATES, SOUTHEAST AND SOUTHWEST AREAS PENSION FUND ET AL.
502 U.S. 811
Supreme Court of the United States (1991)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Elser v. LAW Offs. OF James M. Russ, P.A., 679 So. 2d 309 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996)…cifically, an attorney owes his or her client a duty to only charge the client for those hours that are reasonably necessary to perform the legal services under the contract. See The Florida Bar v. Richardson, 574 So. 2d 60 (Fla.1990), cert, denied, 502 U.S. 811, 112 S.Ct. 57, 116 L.Ed.2d 33 (1991). Public policy demands nothing less.5 [*313] In Richardson, the Florida Supreme Court recognized that “all of the time a lawyer spends on a case is not necessarily the amount of time for which he can properly c…