MINNICKS, EXECUTRIX OF THE SUCCESSION OF MISTICH
v.
MISTICH ET AL.
MINNICKS, EXECUTRIX OF THE SUCCESSION OF MISTICH
MISTICH ET AL.
502 U.S. 815
Supreme Court of the United States (1991)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Jasma Corp. v. Cap. Bank, 644 So. 2d 515 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994)…the Board of Directors or the loan committee. Further, he was required to request loan committee approval of loans over his limit. See Mr. Furniture Warehouse, Inc. v. Barclays American/Commercial Inc., 919 F. 2d 1517 (11th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 815, 112 S.Ct. 68, 116 L.Ed.2d 43 (1991); Pier 66 Co. v. Poulos, 542 So. 2d 377 (Fla. 4th DCA), review denied, 551 So. 2d 462 (Fla.1989); Eastern Air Lines, Inc. v. Gellert, 438 So. 2d 923 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983). We also find the bank lacked independent fa…
-
Deal v. United States, 508 U.S. 129 (U.S. 1993)…1990, the Court of Appeals purported to follow Rawlings, but actually affirmed imposition of two 5-year sentences for convictions on two distinct § 924(c) violations.7 Similarly, in United States v. [*143] Luskin, 926 F. 2d 372 (CA4), cert. denied, 502 U. S. 815 (1991), decided a year later, the Court of Appeals upheld three 5-year sentences for three violations of § 924(c) committed on separate dates, even though the minimum mandatory penalty for a “second or subsequent conviction” was 10 years at the time…