HOWARD COKER, PETITIONER, CROSS-RESPONDENT,
v.
SPACE PAINTING, INC., SUN ART DECORATORS, INC., PAUL SMITH CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, GENERAL ACCIDENT FIRE AND LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY, MICHIGAN MUTUAL LIABILITY, SELF-INSURED AND THE FLORIDA INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION, RESPONDENTS, CROSS-PETITIONERS
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court reviewed the interpretation of a 'no action' provision in a liability insurance policy, specifically concerning the timeliness of notice of a claim and accident by the insured to the insurer.
The court considered whether the insured's delay in notifying the insurer constituted a violation of the policy's 'no action' provision, which required notice as soon as practicable.
A minor was injured by a toy purchased from Juvenile World, Inc. The insured, Juvenile World, Inc., provided notice of the accident and claim to its l…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
By petition and two cross-petitions for writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date February 4, 1969. Our consideration of the petitions, the records and briefs, and oral argument having been heard, leads us to conclude that the petition and cross-petitions for certiorari should be and they are hereby denied.
Attorney’s fee in the amount of $200.00 is awarded to claimant’s attorney for filing briefs in opposition to the cross-petitions.
It is so ordered.
ERVIN, C. J., and ROBERTS, DREW, THORNAL and CARLTON, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Baillargeon v. Sewell, 33 So. 3d 130 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010)…ay for over thirty-five years. It is within the province of the legislature to prescribe statutes providing for the orderly administration of decedent’s estates. See Twomey v. Clausohm, 234 So. 2d 338, 340 (Fla.1970); see also Mudarri v. Gillespie, 226 So. 2d 808, 812 (Fla.1969) (“It is apodictic that the administration of estates of decedents is a matter which is within the power of the legislature to prescribe.”). With the enactment of the Code, the legislature has exercised its prerogatives by adopting a…
-
Mudarri v. Gillespie, 228 So. 2d 297 (Fla. 3d DCA 1969)…2d 482) affirming the order of the Circuit Court for Dade County, Florida, in the above styled cause; and Whereas, on review of this court’s judgment, by certiorari, the Supreme Court of Florida by its opinion and judgment filed September 24, 1969, 226 So. 2d 808 and mandate dated November 3, 1969, now lodged in this court, quashed this court’s judgment; Now, therefore, it is ordered that the mandate of this court issued in this cause on March 15, 1968 is withdrawn, the opinion and judgment of this court fi…