MOORE

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Remillong, 55 F.3d 572 (11th Cir. 1995)
  …is appropriate.” Rl-57; see Appendix. Consequently, this third appeal from Remillong’s sentencing ensued. We review a district court’s restitution order for abuse of discretion. United States v. Husky, 924 F. 2d 223, 225 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 833, 112 S.Ct. 111, 116 L.Ed.2d 81 (1991). The Victim and Witness Protection Act (‘VWPA”), 18 U.S.C. §§ 3663-3664, authorizing restitution to victims of crimes, “specifically directs a sentencing judge to consider not only the victim’s injury, but als…
• United States v. Twitty, 107 F.3d 1482 (11th Cir. 1997)
  …e not sufficiently supported by findings of fact on the record regarding each appellant’s ability to pay. We review a district court’s restitution order for abuse of discretion. United States v. Husky, 924 F. 2d 223, 225 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 833, 112 S.Ct. 111, 116 L.Ed.2d 81 (1991). Freedom’s loss as a result of appellants’ failure to repay their loan amounted to approximately $15 million dollars, not including interest. The RTC recovered $3.7 million from the foreclosure sale. The dist…
• United States v. Apex Roofing OF Tallahassee, Inc., 49 F.3d 1509 (11th Cir. 1995)
  …and Apex timely appealed their respective sentences regarding restitution to the Navy. II. DISCUSSION We review a district court’s order of restitution for abuse of discretion. United States v. Husky, 924 F. 2d 223, 225 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 833, 112 S.Ct. 111, 116 L.Ed.2d 81 (1991). Using restitution as part of a sentence is governed by the Victim and Witness Protection Act (“VWPA”), 18 U.S.C. §§ 3663-3664. Under 18 U.S.C. § 3663(a)(1), a district court is authorized to order a defendant…