BLOOM

v.

EHRLICH

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Junior Hall, 46 F.3d 62 (11th Cir. 1995)
  …2 (11th Cir.1991), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 1588, 118 L.Ed.2d 306 (1992). We review findings of fact for clear error only. 18 U.S.C.A. § 3742(e) (West Supp.1994); see United States v. Martinez, 924 F. 2d 209, 210 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 870, 112 S.Ct. 203, 116 L.Ed.2d 163 (1991). Discussion Sentencing Guidelines subsection 2D1.1(b)(1) provides that the offense level for a drug offense is increased by two levels if “a dangerous weapon (including a firearm) was possessed.” U.S.S.G. § 2D…
• United States v. Dorcas Abike Aduwo, 64 F.3d 626 (11th Cir. 1995)
  …ir.) (noting Otero’s § 2D1.1(b) co-conspirator possession rule tracks Pinkerton and the Guidelines, which “require[ ] that the firearm possession be reasonably foreseen as a necessary or natural consequence of the unlawful agreement”), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 870, 112 S.Ct. 203, 116 L.Ed.2d 163 (1991). We see no reason why the Pinkerton rule of conspirator liability should not apply equally in the context of § 2K2.1(c). Applying the Pinkerton rule to our facts, Brown’s possession of the Glock during the…
• United States v. Whitfield, 50 F.3d 947 (11th Cir. 1995)
  …F. 3d at 1199 (same); cf. United States v. Martinez, 924 F. 2d 209, 210 (11th Cir.) (for purposes of § 2D1.1(b)(1), question of whether defendant possessed firearm “during” the commission of a drug felony is reviewed for clear error), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 870, 112 S.Ct. 203, 116 L.Ed.2d 163 (1991).…