RODERICK JOHNSON, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
RODERICK JOHNSON, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
226 So. 2d 855
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1969)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
Defendant questions the denial of his motion to vacate judgment and sentence pursuant to Criminal Procedure Rule One (now Rule 1.850, 33 F.S.A.) on the ground that the record does not show that the trial court informed him as to the consequences of his guilty plea.
After carefully reviewing the record, in light of the law applicable at the time Johnson entered the guilty plea, we find his argument to be without merit.
Affirmed on the authority of Reddick v. State, Fla.App.1966, 190 So.2d 340.
CROSS, C. J., and McCAIN and REED, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Johnson v. Louie L. Wainwright, 238 So. 2d 590 (Fla. 1970)…ewing the record, in light of the law applicable at the time [*592] Johnson entered the guilty plea, we find his argument without merit. “Affirmed on the authority of Red-dick v. State, Fla.App.1966, 190 So. 2d 340.” Johnson v. State, Fla.App.1969, 226 So. 2d 855. As a basis for relief sought in the instant petition for habeas corpus, Petitioner contends the trial court erred in accepting his guilty plea without inquiring as to whether Petitioner understandingly as well as voluntarily entered his plea. Peti…
Authorities Cited
- Reddick v. State, 190 So. 2d 340 (Fla. 2d DCA 1966)