HENRY EDGAR, SR. ET AL., APPELLANTS,

v.

JOSEPH F. SOLOMON, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1969-10-07

No. 69-670

Before PEARSON, C. J., and CHARLES CARROLL and BARKDULL, JJ-

226 So. 2d 871 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1969) Positive Treatment

Cited by 6 cases

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See: Wilson v. Wilson, 132 Fla. 518, 181 So. 385; Battle v. Butler, 138 Fla. 392, 189 So. 846; Todd v. Hyzer, 154 Fla. 702, 18 So.2d 888; Edmun Realty Corporation v. Kearns, 158 Fla. 558, 28 So.2d 834; Miller v. Murray, Fla.1953, 68 So.2d 594.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Pinellas Cnty. v. Carlson, 242 So. 2d 714 (Fla. 1970)

…34 (Fla.App.2nd, 1967), in which it was stated that merely listing an expert witness as a prospective witness does not waive the work product privilege; Ford Motor Co. v. Cochran, 205 So. 2d 551 (Fla.App.2nd, 1968), and Vermette v. Surf Drugs, Inc., 226 So. 2d 871 (Fla.App.3rd, 1969). It is argued that discovery of con-demnee’s work product should be permitted in all cases at the State’s option, because of the decision of the United States Ninth Circuit in United States v. Meyer, 398 F. 2d 66 (1968), citing…
Vermette v. Surf Drugs, Inc., 236 So. 2d 148 (Fla. 3d DCA 1970)

…PER CURIAM. Whereas, the judgment of this court was entered on September 30, 1969 (226 So. 2d 871) granting in part and denying in part, certiorari review of the order of the Circuit Court of Dade County, Florida, in the above styled cause; and Whereas, on review of this court’s judgment, by certiorari, the Supreme Court of Florida by its opini…
Isaacson v. ARD, 237 So. 2d 205 (Fla. 1st DCA 1970)

…PER CURIAM. Certiorari denied. Vermette v. Surf Drugs, Inc. (Fla.App.1969) 226 So. 2d 871. CARROLL, DONALD K., Acting C. J., and WIGGINTON and RAWLS, JJ., concur.…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw