BARNES ET AL.
v.
MATLOCK

U.S. | 1991-10-15
No. 91-320
502 U.S. 909 Supreme Court of the United States (1991) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Acadia P'rs, L.P. v. Tompkins, 673 So. 2d 487 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996)
    …for rejecting the claim that this action is barred by res judicata or estoppel by judgment, we agree with the court in Billman v. State Deposit Ins. Fund Corp., 86 Md.App. 1, 585 A. 2d 238, cert, denied, 323 Md. 1, 590 A. 2d 158 (Md.), cert, denied, 502 U.S. 909, 112 S.Ct. 304, 116 L.Ed.2d 247 (1991), in which the court stated: [Ajppellants are estopped from arguing res ju-dicata because it directly contradicts their position in their Opposition to Appellees’ Motion to Consolidate. The Court of Appeals, in…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw