BARKDOLL

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Wilda M. Thomas, 62 F.3d 1332 (11th Cir. 1995)
  …novo, is to determine whether the Sentencing Guidelines adequately consider a particular factor, thereby precluding a sentencing court from relying on it as a basis for departure. United States v. Valle, 929 F. 2d 629, 631 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 950, 112 S.Ct. 401, 116 L.Ed.2d 350 (1991); see also United States v. Lnu, 16 F. 3d 1168, 1169 (11th Cir.1994), modified, United States v. Omar, 24 F. 3d 1356 (11th Cir.1994). The Thomases’ contention that the district court erred in determining that…
• United States v. Henderson, 75 F.3d 614 (11th Cir. 1996)
  …line’s range except when it finds that “there exists an aggravating circumstance of a kind, or to a degree, not adequately taken into consideration by the Sentencing Commission.” United States v. Valle, 929 F. 2d 629, 631 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 950, 112 S.Ct. 401, 116 L.Ed.2d 350 (1991);. see also U.S.S.G. § 5K2.0 (1992). Consequently, when the guidelines take into account a factor relied upon by a sentencing court in making a departure, then a departure based on that factor is improper. Will…