POWELL
v.
UNITED STATES
POWELL
UNITED STATES
502 U.S. 981
Supreme Court of the United States (1991)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
United States v. Blackman, 66 F.3d 1572 (11th Cir. 1995)…simple Terry frisk, rather than the severe measures they chose to employ. . Of course, since the remaining appellants lack standing to challenge Salathiel’s illegal seizure, United States v. Powell, 929 F. 2d 1190, 1194-96 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 981, 112 S.Ct. 584, 116 L.Ed.2d 609 (1991); 4 LaFave, supra, § 11.3(a) at 282 (1994 Supp. at 68), they were not entitled to the suppression of those statements. United States v. Payne, 447 U.S. 727, 100 S.Ct. 2439, 65 L.Ed.2d 468 (1980). Since those s…
-
Damiano v. Fed. Deposit Ins. Corp. for Amerifirst Bank, 104 F.3d 328 (11th Cir. 1997)…tter jurisdiction is ordinarily tested as of the time of filing the complaint. Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife, 504 U.S. 555, 569 n. 4, 112 S.Ct. 2130, 2141 n. 4, 119 L.Ed.2d 351 (1992); Rosa v. RTC, 938 F. 2d 383, 392 n. 12 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 981, 112 S.Ct. 582, 116 L.Ed.2d 608 (1991). Therefore, courts in which lawsuits were pending when the RTC is appointed receiver remain vested with jurisdiction. Whatley, 32 F. 3d at 907. This is confirmed by the statute’s reference to the continuatio…