HARPER
v.
THAMES ET AL.
HARPER
THAMES ET AL.
502 U.S. 985
Supreme Court of the United States (1991)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Cargill v. Turpin, 120 F.3d 1366 (11th Cir. 1997)…(1993). See United States v. Cross, 928 F. 2d 1030, 1052 (11th Cir.) (“It is well-established that the improper admission of co-conspirator hearsay, like other Confrontation Clause errors, is subject to the harmless error rule____”), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 985, 112 S.Ct. 594, 116 L.Ed.2d 618 (1991) and 502 U.S. 1060, 112 S.Ct. 941, 117 L.Ed.2d 112 (1992); Cumbie v. Singletary, 991 F. 2d 715, 724-25 (11th Cir.) (applying Brecht standard for harmless error after finding Confrontation Clause violation based…