BURDICK

v.

TAKUSHI, DIRECTOR OF ELECTIONS OF HAWAII, ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Burdick v. Takushi, 504 U.S. 428 (U.S. 1992)
  …ng write-in voting by the Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. See ibid., citing Dixon v. Maryland State Administrative Bd. of Election Laws, 878 F. 2d 776 (CA4 1989). We granted certiorari to resolve the disagreement on this important question. 502 U. S. 1003 (1991). II Petitioner proceeds from the erroneous assumption that a law that imposes any burden upon the right to vote must be subject to strict scrutiny. Our cases do not so hold. [*433] It is beyond cavil that “voting is of the most fundamental…
• Wade v. United States, 504 U.S. 181 (U.S. 1992)
  …-up claim that the District Court was at least authorized to enquire into the Government’s motives for filing no motion, the court saying that any such enquiry would intrude unduly upon a prosecutor’s discretion, id., at 172. We granted, certiorari, 502 U. S. 1003 (1991), and now affirm. The full text of 18 U. S. C. § 3553(e) is this: “Limited Authority to Impose a Sentence Below a Statutory Minimum. — Upon motion of the Government, the court shall have the authority to impose a sentence below a level estab…
• Est. of Cowart v. Nicklos Drilling Co., 505 U.S. 469 (U.S. 1992)
  …agency interpretation of the phrase “person entitled to compensation,” to which the Court of Appeals should have deferred. We granted certiorari because of the large number of LHWCA claimants who might be affected by the Court of Appeals’ decision. 502 U. S. 1003 (1991). We now affirm. 1 — 1 In a statutory construction case, the beginning point must be the language of the statute, and when a statute speaks with clarity to an issue judicial inquiry into the statute's meaning, in all but the most extraordina…