ANKENBRANDT, AS NEXT FRIEND AND MOTHER OF L. R. ET AL.

v.

RICHARDS ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• YEE v. City of Escondido, 503 U.S. 519 (U.S. 1992)
  …y to frame the question to be decided in any way he chooses, without being limited to the manner in which the question was framed below. While we have on occasion rephrased the question presented by a petitioner, see, e. g., Ankenbrandt v. Richards, 502 U. S. 1023 (1992), or requested the parties to address an important question of law not raised in the petition for certiorari, see, e. g., Payne v. Tennessee, 498 U. S. 1080 (1991), by and large it is the petitioner himself who controls the scope of the questi…
• Forsyth Cnty. v. Nationalist Movement, 505 U.S. 123 (U.S. 1992)
  …ssented, arguing that this Court’s cases do not require that fees be nominal. Id., at 1493. We granted certiorari to resolve a conflict among the Courts of Appeals concerning the constitutionality of charging a fee for a speaker in a public forum.8 502 U. S. 1023 (1991). II Respondent mounts a facial challenge to the Forsyth County ordinance. It is well established that in the area of freedom of expression an overbroad regulation may be subject to facial review and invalidation, even though its application…
• Ankenbrandt v. Richards, 504 U.S. 689 (U.S. 1992)
  …permit a district court to abstain from exercising diversity jurisdiction over a tort action for damages?”2 and “(3) Did the District Court in this case err in abstaining from exercising jurisdiction under the doctrine [*693] of Younger v. Harris?” 502 U. S. 1023 (1992). We address each of these issues in turn. II The domestic relations exception upon which the courts below relied to decline jurisdiction has been invoked often by the lower federal courts. The seeming authority for doing so originally stemm…