NEW YORK

v.

UNITED STATES ET AL.; COUNTY OF ALLEGANY, NEW YORK V. UNITED STATES ET AL.; AND COUNTY OF CORTLAND, NEW YORK V. UNITED STATES ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• YEE v. City of Escondido, 503 U.S. 519 (U.S. 1992)
  …y to frame the question to be decided in any way he chooses, without being limited to the manner in which the question was framed below. While we have on occasion rephrased the question presented by a petitioner, see, e. g., Ankenbrandt v. Richards, 502 U. S. 1023 (1992), or requested the parties to address an important question of law not raised in the petition for certiorari, see, e. g., Payne v. Tennessee, 498 U. S. 1080 (1991), by and large it is the petitioner himself who controls the scope of the questi…
• Forsyth Cnty. v. Nationalist Movement, 505 U.S. 123 (U.S. 1992)
  …ssented, arguing that this Court’s cases do not require that fees be nominal. Id., at 1493. We granted certiorari to resolve a conflict among the Courts of Appeals concerning the constitutionality of charging a fee for a speaker in a public forum.8 502 U. S. 1023 (1991). II Respondent mounts a facial challenge to the Forsyth County ordinance. It is well established that in the area of freedom of expression an overbroad regulation may be subject to facial review and invalidation, even though its application…