CAMPIERE ET AL.
v.
LOUISIANA POWER & LIGHT CO.
CAMPIERE ET AL.
LOUISIANA POWER & LIGHT CO.
502 U.S. 1035
Supreme Court of the United States (1992)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Tech. Res. Servs., Inc. v. Dornier Med. Sys., Inc., 134 F.3d 1458 (11th Cir. 1998)…award of $184,778.84 in costs to DMSI under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1821 and 1920. This court will not disturb a costs award in the absence of a clear abuse of discretion. Cochran v. E.I. duPont de Nemours, 933 F. 2d 1533, 1540 (11th Cir.1991), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1035, 112 S.Ct. 881, 116 L.Ed.2d 785 (1992). We conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in awarding costs to DMSI, with the exception of the award for videographer expenses. A portion of the $5,950.48 award to DMSI for videographer…
-
Eagleview Techs., Inc. v. MDS Assocs., 190 F.3d 1195 (11th Cir. 1999)…shed that the defendants acted with the requisite criminal intent. III. Award of Costs This Court reviews a cost award for clear abuse of discretion. See Cochran v. E.I. duPont de Nemours & Co., 933 F. 2d 1533, 1540 (11th Cir.1991), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1035, 112 S.Ct. 881, 116 L.Ed.2d 785 (1992). In this case we would affirm the award of costs under our Eleventh Circuit Rule 36-1 without opinion. See Terry Properties, Inc. v. Standard Oil Co., 799 F. 2d 1523, 1540 (11th Cir.1986) (awarded costs even…