CALIFORNIA SAND & GRAVEL, INC.
v.
UNITED STATES

U.S. | 1992-01-21
No. 91-661
502 U.S. 1057 Supreme Court of the United States (1992) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Patterson v. Shumate, 504 U.S. 753 (U.S. 1992)
    …should be excluded from the bankruptcy estate under § 541(c)(2). Ibid. The court then declined to consider Shumate’s alternative argument that his interest in the Plan qualified for exemption under § 522(b). Id., at 365-366. We granted certiorari, 502 U. S. 1057 (1992), to resolve the conflict among the Courts of Appeals as to whether an antialienation provision in an ERISA-qualified pension plan constitutes a restriction on transfer enforceable under “applicable nonbankruptcy law” for purposes of the § 541…
  • Bursik v. ONE Fourth St. N., Ltd., 84 F.3d 1395 (11th Cir. 1996)
    …fected by the D'Oench restrictions. . While the Eleventh Circuit has not addressed this issue, the circuits considering this issue have adopted this interpretation. See 281-300 Joint Venture v. Onion, 938 F. 2d 35, 39 (5th Cir.1991), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1057, 112 S.Ct. 933, 117 L.Ed.2d 105 (1992); Rosa v. RTC, 938 F. 2d 383, 397-400 (3d Cir.1991), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 981, 112 S.Ct. 582, 116 L.Ed.2d 608 (1991); In re Landmark Land Co. of Oklahoma, 973 F. 2d 283 (4th Cir.1992); Gross v. Bell Savings Ba…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw