IN RE JARRETT; AND IN RE JARVI

Citator

Cited By

• Chem. Waste Mgmt., Inc. v. Hunt, 504 U.S. 334 (U.S. 1992)
  …the federal question and the likelihood that it had been decided in a way conflicting with applicable decisions of this Court, this Court’s Rule 10.1(c), we granted certiorari limited to petitioner’s Commerce Clause challenge to the additional fee. 502 U. S. 1070 (1992). We now reverse. II No State may attempt to isolate itself from a problem common to the several States by raising barriers to the free flow [*340] of interstate trade.3 Today, in Fort Gratiot Sanitary Landfill, Inc. v. Michigan Dept. of Nat…
• Burlington N. R.R. Co. v. Ford, 504 U.S. 648 (U.S. 1992)
  …not even discriminate against Burlington, since Ford and Johnson could have sued the corporation in the Federal District Court for Montana, which sits in Yellowstone County, among other places. Id., at 197, 819 P. 2d, at 175. We granted cer-tiorari, 502 U. S. 1070 (1992), and, although our reasoning differs from that of the State Supreme Court, now affirm.* A Montana statute provides that “the proper place of trial for all civil actions is the county in which the defendants or any of them may reside at the c…