SCHULZ

v.

WASHINGTON COUNTY ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• State v. Suarez-Mesa, 662 So. 2d 735 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995)
  …ve recognized that a spouse who has a legal interest in the property but not a current possessory interest can be charged with burglary. See, e.g., White v. State, 587 So. 2d 1218 (Ala.Crim.App.1990), aff'd, 587 So. 2d 1236 (Ala.1991), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1076, 112 S.Ct. 979, 117 L.Ed.2d 142 (1992); State v. Herrin, 6 Ohio App.3d 68, 453 N.E. 2d 1104 (1982); State v. Schneider, 36 Wash.App. 237, 673 P. 2d 200 (1983). A court order can negate a person’s right to enter the premises even if that person own…
• Jones v. United States, 224 F.3d 1251 (11th Cir. 2000)
  …law regarding suppression of wiretap evidence. This court affirmed Jones’s conviction without mentioning the delay in sealing the wiretap evidence. See United States v. Jones, 940 F. 2d 673 (1991), cert. denied, sub nom. Newsome v. United States, 502 U.S. 1076, 112 S.Ct. 977, 117 L.Ed.2d 141 (1992). The § 2255 Proceedings Jones moved under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. Among the grounds for Jones’s motion were that his attorney ineffectively failed to (1) move to suppre…