PADRON
v.
UNITED STATES

U.S. | 1992-01-27
No. 91-6320
502 U.S. 1076 Supreme Court of the United States (1992) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • State v. Suarez-Mesa, 662 So. 2d 735 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995)
    …ve recognized that a spouse who has a legal interest in the property but not a current possessory interest can be charged with burglary. See, e.g., White v. State, 587 So. 2d 1218 (Ala.Crim.App.1990), aff'd, 587 So. 2d 1236 (Ala.1991), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1076, 112 S.Ct. 979, 117 L.Ed.2d 142 (1992); State v. Herrin, 6 Ohio App.3d 68, 453 N.E. 2d 1104 (1982); State v. Schneider, 36 Wash.App. 237, 673 P. 2d 200 (1983). A court order can negate a person’s right to enter the premises even if that person own…
  • Jones v. United States, 224 F.3d 1251 (11th Cir. 2000)
    …law regarding suppression of wiretap evidence. This court affirmed Jones’s conviction without mentioning the delay in sealing the wiretap evidence. See United States v. Jones, 940 F. 2d 673 (1991), cert. denied, sub nom. Newsome v. United States, 502 U.S. 1076, 112 S.Ct. 977, 117 L.Ed.2d 141 (1992). The § 2255 Proceedings Jones moved under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. Among the grounds for Jones’s motion were that his attorney ineffectively failed to (1) move to suppre…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw