CURTIS ET AL., ADMINISTRATORS OF THE ESTATES OF GOFF ET UX., ET AL.
v.
UNITED STATES
CURTIS ET AL., ADMINISTRATORS OF THE ESTATES OF GOFF ET UX., ET AL.
UNITED STATES
502 U.S. 1091
Supreme Court of the United States (1992)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Swint v. Chambers Cnty. Comm'n, 514 U.S. 35 (U.S. 1995)…(pendent appellate jurisdiction is properly exercised where “review of the appealable issue involves consideration of factors closely related or relevant to the otherwise nonappealable issue” and judicial economy is served by review), cert. denied, 502 U. S. 1091 (1992); Stewart v. Baldwin County Bd. of Ed., 908 F. 2d 1499, 1509 (CA11 1990) (“Pendent jurisdiction is properly exercised over nonappealable decisions of the district court when the reviewing court already has jurisdiction over one issue in the ca…