MILZMAN

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Remillong, 55 F.3d 572 (11th Cir. 1995)
  …63 and 3664”). “This requirement ensures that a defendant will be able to pay restitution, and also ensures that restitution payments will not unduly limit his right to appeal.” United States v. Kress, 944 F. 2d 155, 163 (3d Cir.1991), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1092, 112 S.Ct. 1163, 117 L.Ed.2d 410 (1992); see United States v. McIlvain, 967 F. 2d 1479, 1481 (10th Cir.1992) (“[W]hen a district court orders restitution it must be consistent with a defendant’s ability to pay.”). “A district court’s failure to make…
• United States v. Edilio Diaz, 190 F.3d 1247 (11th Cir. 1999)
  …scription of Puma’s car lot business — -“Diamond Oaks Motor Company, 4249 Denton Highway, Haltom City, Texas” and “$5,030.00 in U.S. currency” — amply sufficient notice that government sought forfeiture of all of the company’s assets), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1092, 112 S.Ct. 1165, 117 L.Ed.2d 412 (1992); United States v. Possick, 849 F. 2d 332, 340 (8th Cir.1988)(description of “a home” located at a particular address on a particular parcel of land adequate); United States v. Boffa, 688 F. 2d 919, 939 (3rd Ci…
• United States v. Reorganized CF&I Fabricators of Utah, Inc., 518 U.S. 213 (U.S. 1996)
  …1 claims in the Bankruptcy Court, we focus on the one at issue here, the § 4971(a) claim for the deficiency in the 1989 plan year. Compare In re Mansfield Tire & Rubber Co., 942 F. 2d 1055 (CA6 1991), cert. denied sub nom. Krugliak v. United States, 502 U. S. 1092 (1992), with In re Cassidy, 983 F. 2d 161 (CA10 1992); In re C-T of Va., Inc., 977 F. 2d 137 (CA4 1992). This provision was modified slightly between 1898 and 1978, most notably in 1938, when it was moved to § 64(a)(4) (and given fourth priority) a…